| |
|
| |
By early February
1861, South Carolina and six other states had seceded from the
Union. Yet James Buchanan, the outgoing Democratic president,
urged Congress to find a peaceful solution to the problem between
the North and the South. The Senate and the House appointed committees
to try and work out some kind of compromise. In the Senate, one
idea that seemed to gather support was for the Crittenden Compromise,
put forth by Senator John J. Crittenden of Kentucky, which called
for a series of constitutional amendments. One would have protected
slavery in the states; another would answer southerners
demands for returning fugitive slaves and resolve the issue of
slavery in the District of Columbia. But the most important part
of the Crittenden Compromise had to do with the issue of slavery
in the territories.
Senator Crittenden wanted to re-establish the Missouri Compromise
line of 36-30 in all the territories that now belonged
or might in the future belong to the United States. Slavery would
be permitted south of the line, forbidden north of the line. Southern
members indicated they would accept this compromise if the Republicans
agreed as well. President-elect Lincoln was consulted, and he
said no. First of all, in his view, it would encourage slave states
to embark on imperialistic ventures in Latin America where they
could acquire more slave states; and, furthermore, it abandoned
the basic Republican Party principle of no expansion of slavery
into the territories.6 Thus, this compromise was rejected.
Imagine two scenarios:
1. This Crittenden
Compromise is accepted, the seceding states return to the Union,
and the United States avoids a Civil War. What would life have
been like in the United States had there been no Civil War?
2. Abraham Lincoln
is elected president in 1861 and South Carolina secedes. Confederates
fire on Fort Sumter. The fort is evacuated. Lincoln calls up
the militia. Six more southern states secede. These Confederate
states claim they are entitled to secede from the Union. It
was as sovereign states that they made the Union in 1789, and,
according to them, they have a right to dissolve their allegiance
to that Union if it no longer serves their needs. Lincoln, though
he is thoroughly opposed to this philosophy, agrees to let these
states leave the Union in order to avoid a tragic civil war.
Meanwhile, in sympathy with the views of the other southern
states, Virginia, Tennessee, Arkansas, and North Carolina secede
as well. They form a government called the Confederate States
of America, and establish legitimate diplomatic ties to France,
Britain, and other European countries. What would the United
States of America and the Confederate States of America
have been like if the Confederates had been allowed to go?
Activity:
Get into groups with other students in your classroom, and
brainstorm what might have happened in Scenarios 1 and 2. Try
to keep in mind the issues that divided the two regions, and
think of how they might logically have been resolved in a different
circumstance. What would have happened to slavery, for example?
After you have had some time to generate ideas with your classmates,
write a story. Create a character that you place in either a
southern or a northern setting in the year 1870, and describe
his or her life. Share your stories with your classmates. Ask
your teacher to judge which creative writing seems most "authentic."
A follow-up:
Respond to these
questions in a class discussion:
Did this exercise
cause you to think about other approaches the leaders within
the United States might have used in the late 1850s to avert
a civil war?
Was the Civil War
an "irrepressible conflict," or could the story have
ended differently?
Was President Abraham
Lincoln right to insist that "the Union is in perpetuity"?
|
| |
| |
Please
use the navigational back button to return to lesson |
|
|